How Lithuania’s Stand Against China is Shaping U.S. Economic Diplomacy

Image Credit: Reuters

Amid escalating global conflicts and diplomatic tensions, the United States has initiated a strategic response to economic coercion from China, providing crucial support to nations facing trade threats. An eight-person team at the State Department, dubbed “the firm,” has become instrumental in mitigating the economic fallout for countries targeted by China. This initiative highlights the broader geopolitical struggle as nations navigate the complex dynamics of international trade and diplomacy.

Latest Updates: The State Department’s team emerged two years ago during a dispute between Lithuania and China over Taiwan. Since then, “the firm” has expanded its scope, assisting over a dozen countries in managing the economic pressure exerted by Beijing. Under the leadership of State Department senior adviser Melanie Hart, the team assesses vulnerabilities and formulates responses for nations cut off or at risk of losing trade with China, a global economic powerhouse.

Undersecretary of State Jose Fernandez explained the team’s significance, noting that countries reach out to the U.S. for help without the need for solicitation. “We run a consulting firm that does not have to advertise for clients, as they come,” Fernandez said. This underscores the high demand for support in countering China’s economic tactics, which the Chinese Embassy in Washington has vehemently denied, labeling U.S. accusations as “completely unfounded.”

Ongoing Wars and Diplomatic Tensions: China’s economic coercion has been evident in several high-profile instances. In 2010, after a Norwegian committee awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to a Chinese dissident, China halted salmon imports from Norway. Similarly, in 2020, China imposed tariffs on Australian barley and wine following Australia’s call for an investigation into the origins of COVID-19. The most recent case involves Lithuania, which faced severe trade disruptions after allowing Taiwan’s de-facto embassy in Vilnius to use the name Taiwan instead of Taipei.

Instead of capitulating, Lithuania sought assistance from the U.S. and its allies. American diplomats facilitated new markets for Lithuanian goods, and the Export-Import Bank provided Vilnius with $600 million in export credit. Additionally, the Pentagon signed a procurement agreement with Lithuania, demonstrating the multi-faceted support the U.S. can mobilize in such situations.

Human Rights and Regional Developments: Fernandez emphasized that China’s strategy of intimidation is being countered effectively by U.S. initiatives. He noted, “The time had come to stop this thing,” highlighting the necessity of international solidarity in resisting economic bullying. The U.S. State Department serves as the initial point of contact, coordinating with other agencies to deploy the full spectrum of U.S. governmental resources in response to such crises.

Cultural Events and Organizations: This month, Lithuania hosted a conference focused on resisting economic pressure, with Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis stating that China’s objective was to force nations into reversing their policies publicly. Fernandez, who attended the conference, praised Lithuania’s resilience, asserting that their stance offered proof of viable alternatives to economic coercion.

Liu Pengyu, a spokesman for the Chinese Embassy, countered by stating that Lithuania’s issues were political rather than economic, blaming Lithuania’s actions for the strained relations.

Environmental and Trade Initiatives: The State Department’s team’s assistance remains confidential, avoiding details about specific tools or countries involved. Shay Wester of the Asia Society Policy Institute described the initiative as essential, addressing China’s growing use of economic coercion to influence political disputes.

The demand for such support is clear, as demonstrated by Lithuania’s proactive measures and the U.S.’s strategic interventions. This evolving situation underscores the need for comprehensive international cooperation to navigate the complexities of global trade and diplomatic relations. As nations grapple with these challenges, the role of “the firm” becomes increasingly vital in maintaining economic stability and sovereignty.

As reported by AP News in their recent article